@mzjacobson any reason you deleted your jobs data? t.co/Oyj3BX7qBy mikebastasch tweeted on Jan 14, 2016 00:27

@MikeBastasch No jobs data were deleted. They were test #s never used. I informed @saeverley t.co/5d9QECirSI … yet he still used mzjacobson replied on Jan 14, 2016 00:33

@mzjacobson @saeverley but then why did you only delete after @saeverley called you out? mikebastasch replied on Jan 14, 2016 00:34

@MikeBastasch Now clear @saeverley intentionally used fictitious #s for analysis then lied by saying real data deleted.Real data still there mzjacobson replied on Jan 14, 2016 00:36

@mzjacobson @saeverley but why did you delete these "test" columns? Why even have them just sitting there? mikebastasch replied on Jan 14, 2016 00:38

@MikeBastasch @saeverley Spreadsheets humongous. Lots of dead or test #s. Those particular #s obviously dead since not linked to anything mzjacobson replied on Jan 14, 2016 00:43

@mzjacobson @saeverley But n the data you deleted, you inherently assume const. jobs weren't 'long-term'... then you argued they weren't mikebastasch replied on Jan 14, 2016 00:47

@MikeBastasch No, long-term=beyond 40-years construction as I told @saeverley Jan 5 t.co/WomMRECl23 He still lied it was 1 yr mzjacobson replied on Jan 14, 2016 00:56

@mzjacobson @saeverley so the same 3.9 million people would have one-year const. jobs for 40 yrs? Seems like kind of a weird stat mikebastasch replied on Jan 14, 2016 00:58

@MikeBastasch @saeverley The total #1-year jobs is 3.9 x 40=156 million. These are spread over 40 yrs, which means 3.9 mil 40-yr jobs. mzjacobson replied on Jan 14, 2016 01:10